Indicador de Resiliência baseado em Julgamento Situacional (IRJS) : construção e evidências de validade de conteúdo

Abstract

The term resilience is understood as a potential meaning of adversaries and as a meaning of adverse or stressful conditions. As it is a phenomenon of recent studies, the interest in its manifestation has been relatively recent in the current scenario, as modern society has presented itself with great challenges such as depressive, anxiogenic, and stressful conditions. As a result, several instruments were created to assess resilience, however, such tools were criticized for being more associated with estimates of behavioral adjustment, not considering them as specific to the construction of resilience. For this reason, the main objective of this research was to build an instrument that assesses this validity for Permanent Resilience or the authorized adult audience based on IRJS Situational Judgment. This measure is adjusted for the items that will allow the expression of behavior and behavior, taking into account the positive behavior of the construction. For this, the following theoretical and methodological procedures were carried out: literature review, in which 14,692 studies were selected, 962 studies were selected. In this review, it was observed that the most recurrent year of studies on resilience was the year 2020, which were mostly in article format, with a qualitative design, which sought to investigate the contextual conceptualization of the construct, generally aimed at the public. university, with the country with the largest number of collections being the United States of America; (b) construction of the instrument, in which the items were elaborated from the six fundamental elements that constitute resilience according to the theory of Castillo et al. ). The built items were inspired by movies, series, real situations, among others and that are considered as aversive situations for the adult population; and (c) verification of evidence of validity based on the content, which was divided into two different stages, namely: (1) the study of the judges, which had as a final result of the two rounds carried out the approval of 37 items to compose the version current IRJS and (2) the pilot study, which allowed for grammatical correction in the instructions of the items, as well as making it possible to verify if the scenarios described in the items were following reality. With this study, it was possible to build an instrument that allows the assessment of resilience through situational judgment aimed at the adult audience, and adequate evidence of content validity was found for its improvement. Such evidence points to a potentially useful instrument in the clinical, work, and research context, which can be understood as a new tool to help in the process of evaluating the resilience construct